T
iTokenly

Crypto Bankruptcies: What Creditors Were Owed and What They Got Back

Every crypto exchange, lender and fund we can verify that stopped returning customer assets, from $10 million in claims upward. Each entry carries its docket number where a case exists, so any figure here can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust.

Verified failures
26
Owed to creditors
$32.9B
Paid back so far
$16B
Paid nothing yet
11

Totals above count verified entries only. A further 4 failures are listed as reported but not independently confirmed, and are excluded from every figure on this page.

Read the recovery column with its basis

A recovery percentage means nothing on its own. Most large US estates fix each claim in dollars on the day the case opens and repay against that frozen figure, so a plan can pay out more than 100 per cent of a claim while returning a fraction of the bitcoin someone actually deposited — because the price moved during the years in between. Returning the same assets in kind is a different outcome entirely, and it is rare. Every percentage in this register is printed with the basis it was measured against, and the two are never separated, including in the CSV and JSON exports.

Take the data

No key, no sign-up, no rate limit for ordinary use. Published under CC BY 4.0 — reuse it commercially if you credit iTokenly and link back.

Showing 30 of 30
iTokenly Crypto Failure Registry30 recorded failures
HaltedBusinessOwedRecoveredCauseProceedingEvidence
AscendEXCentralised exchange · Singapore$240M0%Basis not establishedUndisclosedLiquidity shortfall after failed strategic transactionNo formal processOngoingReported5 sources
BlockFillsBroker or OTC desk · United States$75M–$500M0%No distributions yetMismanagementLending, trading and mining losses; commingling allegedChapter 11 · U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware · 26-10371 (TMH)OngoingVerified5 sources
Stream FinanceProtocol or DAO · No jurisdiction established$93M–$160M0%No distributions yetMismanagementLoss at external fund manager; opaque off-chain strategiesNo formal processOngoingVerified4 sources
WazirXCentralised exchange · Singapore$196M–$207M149,559 creditors85%Petition-date USDHack or theftMulti-signature wallet drainedOther · High Court of Singapore · HC/OA 861/2024Distributions under wayVerified9 sources
BitForexCentralised exchange · Hong Kong$56.5M50%Basis not establishedUndisclosedHot wallets emptied; team detained by police in ChinaNo formal processOngoingVerified5 sources
JPEXCentralised exchange · Hong Kong$206M2,700 creditors0%No distributions yetFraud or misappropriationUnlicensed platform, withdrawals blockedNo formal processOngoingVerified5 sources
MultichainProtocol or DAO · Singapore$126M–$210M0%No distributions yetUndisclosedNever established: key compromise or insider drainLiquidation · General Division of the High Court of the Republic of SingaporeOngoingVerified5 sources
Prime TrustCustodian or payment processor · United States$100M–$500MNo distributions yetMismanagementLost access to a legacy wallet; customer funds used to cover withdrawalsChapter 11 · D. Del. · 23-11161Plan confirmedVerified7 sources
DelioLender or yield platform · South Korea$49.2M–$176M2,800 creditors0%No distributions yetFraud or misappropriationDeposits lent out and lost; CEO convicted in partLiquidation · Seoul Rehabilitation CourtOngoingVerified6 sources
Haru InvestLender or yield platform · South Korea$467M–$1B16,000 creditors0%No distributions yetContagionDeposits lost through external manager after FTXLiquidation · Seoul Rehabilitation CourtOngoingVerified6 sources
BittrexCentralised exchange · United States$500M–$1B100,000 creditors100%In kindRegulatory actionSEC action forced US wind-downChapter 11 · U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware · 23-10598 (BLS)Distributions under wayVerified9 sources
BitzlatoCentralised exchange · Other$19M70%In kindRegulatory actionInfrastructure seized in coordinated law enforcement actionNo formal processOngoingReported6 sources
Genesis Global CapitalLender or yield platform · United States$4.8B–$5.4B51%In kindContagionThree Arrows default, then FTX collapse triggered a runChapter 11 · S.D.N.Y. · 23-10063Distributions under wayVerified6 sources
AAX (Atom Asset Exchange)Centralised exchange · Cayman Islands$30M0%No distributions yetFraud or misappropriationWithdrawals halted as a 'system upgrade'; wallet keys allegedly taken by an insiderLiquidation · Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, Financial Services Division · FSD 54 of 2023OngoingVerified7 sources
BlockFiLender or yield platform · United States$1B–$10B100,000 creditors100%Petition-date USDContagionAlameda loan exposure; FTX rescue facility collapsedChapter 11 · D.N.J. · 22-19361Distributions under wayVerified7 sources
FTXCentralised exchange · United States$9.2B–$11.9B150,000 creditors105%Petition-date USDFraud or misappropriationCustomer funds routed to affiliate Alameda ResearchChapter 11 · D. Del. · 22-11068Distributions under wayVerified7 sources
Compute NorthMining company · United States$100M–$500MBasis not establishedMarket or leverage lossesDebt-funded buildout hit by price crash and power costsChapter 11 · U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division · 22-90273Plan confirmedVerified5 sources
HodlnautLender or yield platform · Singapore$302M–$349M27%Petition-date USDMarket or leverage lossesTerra/UST losses via Anchor protocolLiquidation · General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore · HC/CWU 94/2023Distributions under wayVerified8 sources
ZipmexCentralised exchange · Singapore$97.1M70,000 creditors0%No distributions yetContagionUS$48m stuck at Babel, US$5m at CelsiusLiquidation · General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore · OA 381–385 of 2022 (group moratoria)OngoingVerified7 sources
Vauld (Defi Payments)Lender or yield platform · Singapore$325M–$402M147,000 creditors61%In kindLiquidity runUS$198m withdrawn in three weeks amid Terra and 3AC contagionOther · General Division of the High Court of the Republic of SingaporeDistributions under wayVerified7 sources
Voyager DigitalBroker or OTC desk · United States$1.8B100,000 creditors70%Petition-date USDContagionThree Arrows Capital defaulted on a ~$650m loanChapter 11 · S.D.N.Y. · 22-10943Distributions under wayVerified7 sources
CoinFLEXCentralised exchange · Seychelles$47M–$84MBasis not establishedMarket or leverage lossesSingle counterparty margin defaultOther · Supreme Court of SeychellesPlan confirmedReported7 sources
Babel FinanceLender or yield platform · Singapore$1.5B0%No distributions yetMismanagementUnhedged proprietary trading with customer assetsOther · General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore · OA 192–196 of 2023; OA 881 of 2023OngoingVerified6 sources
Three Arrows CapitalFund or trading firm · British Virgin Islands$2.7B–$3.5B154 creditorsPetition-date USDMarket or leverage lossesLeveraged bets, Terra/LUNA and GBTC lossesLiquidation · Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court, High Court of Justice (BVI), Commercial Division · BVIHC(COM)2022/0119Distributions under wayVerified7 sources
Celsius NetworkLender or yield platform · United States$4.7B600,000 creditors67%Petition-date USDFraud or misappropriationYield promises funded by loss-making trades; CEO convictedChapter 11 · S.D.N.Y. · 22-10964Distributions under wayVerified7 sources
Terraform LabsToken or stablecoin issuer · United States$100M–$500M16,640 creditors0%No distributions yetFraud or misappropriationStablecoin depeg; jury found fraudChapter 11 · U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware · 24-10070 (BLS)Plan confirmedVerified11 sources
ThodexCentralised exchange · Türkiye$12.5M–$2.5B391,000 creditors0%No distributions yetFraud or misappropriationExit scam; founder fled the countryNo formal processOngoingReported8 sources
QuadrigaCXCentralised exchange · Canada$160M–$222M17,648 creditors13%Petition-date USDFraud or misappropriationPonzi scheme; missing cold walletsCCAA · Supreme Court of Nova ScotiaDistributions under wayVerified10 sources
CryptopiaCentralised exchange · New Zealand$225MIn kindHack or theftJanuary 2019 wallet breach, then insolvencyLiquidation · High Court of New ZealandDistributions under wayVerified10 sources
Mt. GoxCentralised exchange · Japan$417M–$3.2B24,750 creditorsIn kindHack or theftLong-running theft of customer bitcoinCivil rehabilitation · Tokyo District CourtDistributions under wayVerified10 sources

Every row has a permanent anchor: append #slug to this page's address to link straight to an entry.

What “verified” means here

A verified entry has at least two independent sources. A petition, a schedule of liabilities, a disclosure statement, a trustee report or a regulator's notice each counts as one. Five outlets restating the same filing count once. Entries that never clear that bar stay in the table marked as reported and are left out of every total.

Corrections

Recovery figures move every time an estate distributes, so entries here change more often than they do in the hack registry. When a published number changes, the entry records what changed and why, and the change stays visible. If something here is wrong, write to [email protected] and it will be checked against the filings.

Common questions about crypto company failures

How much money have crypto companies owed their customers when they failed?
Between 2014 and 2026 this registry records $32.92 billion owed to customers and creditors across 26 verified failures of $10 million or more, of which $15.98 billion has been paid back so far. The figure counts claims as scheduled or allowed in the proceeding. It is not the companies' former valuations and not the peak market value of the tokens involved, both of which produce much larger and much less meaningful numbers.
Did FTX and Celsius creditors get their money back?
It depends entirely on what "back" means, and this is the most misquoted point in the subject. 8 of the estates here repay claims that were converted into dollars on the day the case opened. A plan that pays 100 per cent of such a claim has repaid the dollar value of the assets as of that date — not the assets themselves. If those assets rose in price during the proceeding, and in crypto they usually did, the creditor receives far less than they put in while the headline reads "made whole". Only 5 estates in this registry have returned assets in kind. Every recovery figure in this registry states which of the two it is.
What is the biggest crypto bankruptcy?
FTX, measured by claims against the estate, at $11.2 billion, after customers lost access on November 8, 2022. Ranking by claims rather than by press coverage matters: the most reported collapse is not always the one that owed the most.
Why do crypto exchanges and lenders fail?
Fraud or misappropriation is the most common proximate cause here, behind 7 of 26 verified failures. Most collapses have more than one cause — a hole in the balance sheet and a withdrawal run usually arrive together — so this registry records the trigger rather than trying to apportion blame across everything that went wrong.
How long do crypto bankruptcies take?
Every one of the 26 verified cases in this registry is still open, and 11 of them have distributed nothing to creditors at all. Estates spanning several jurisdictions run longest, because assets have to be recovered under one country's law before they can be distributed under another's. The year a case opened is in the registry alongside its current status.
Which year was worst for crypto company failures?
2022, with $29.9 billion in claims across 13 verified failures. Failures cluster: one large counterparty collapsing takes down the businesses that lent to it, so the totals for a bad year are driven by contagion rather than by many unrelated events.
Can I use this data in my own reporting?
Yes. The registry is published under CC BY 4.0, so you may republish, adapt and build on it, including commercially, as long as you credit iTokenly and link back. CSV and JSON exports are linked at the top of the page and need no key or account. Every entry lists its sources, including docket numbers where a case exists, so you can pull the filing rather than take a figure from us.

Cite this

This data is published under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse it, including commercially, as long as you credit iTokenly and link back.

iTokenly Crypto Failure Registry, iTokenly, accessed 2026-08-21, https://itokenly.com/failures
https://itokenly.com/failures

Permalinks never change. If an entry is renamed, the old address keeps working.

Last updated August 21, 2026. Read the methodology for inclusion criteria, how claims are measured, and how recovery is reported.