pNetwork (pGALA bridge) hack — November 2022
Incident facts
| Date of incident | |
|---|---|
| Publicly disclosed | November 3, 2022 |
| Target type | Cross-chain bridge |
| Loss | $4,590,000Published estimates range $4,300,000 to $4,590,000Price at time of incident |
| Method | Access control flawThe pGALA token contract on BNB Chain was deployed with a misconfiguration that left mint authority outside pNetwork's control. pNetwork then used its own privileges to mint 55.6 billion uncollateralised pGALA in two batches (20:13 and 20:27 UTC) and sold them into the PancakeSwap pGALA/WBNB pool, extracting 12,977 BNB from the pool's liquidity providers. The drain address published by pNetwork was 0x6891a233bca9e72a078bcb71ba02ad482a44e8c1. |
| Chains | BNB Chain |
| Attributed to | pNetwork (self-declared white-hat operation; characterised as a malicious hack by HTX and disputed in litigation by Gala Games)Confirmed |
| Outcome | Users reimbursed |
What happened
On 3 November 2022 pNetwork disclosed that the pGALA contract on BNB Chain, the wrapped representation of Gala Games' GALA token issued through its bridge, had been deployed with a misconfiguration that left mint authority outside the team's control. pNetwork said in its post-mortem that ownership of the contract had been covertly taken over, meaning an unknown party could mint uncollateralised pGALA and use it to claim the GALA collateral held on Ethereum.
Rather than wait, pNetwork used its own privileges to mint 55.6 billion uncollateralised pGALA in two equal batches at 20:13 and 20:27 UTC and sold them into the PancakeSwap pGALA/WBNB pool, extracting 12,977 BNB. pNetwork put that at $4,589,449 at the time; The Block reported roughly $4.3 million and gave the figure as 12,976 BNB. pNetwork described the drain as a white-hat action to stop the pool being taken by someone else, and said no hack had in fact been carried out by whoever controlled the contract.
That characterisation is disputed. HTX published a statement calling the operation a malicious hack driven by profit and bad faith rather than a white-hat operation, said pNetwork minted the tokens 50 minutes after contacting exchanges, and argued that a minimum of 24 hours' notice was warranted. Gala Games sued pNetwork on 20 March 2023, seeking approximately $27.67 million, alleging that pNetwork was negligent in maintaining the bridge and mistakenly leaked a governance key when deploying it, and that pNetwork's recovery plan failed to recover the assets and caused further harm.
pNetwork's published plan was to reissue fully collateralised pGALA one-for-one against snapshot balances and to return the 12,977 BNB to holders of the uncollateralised token. Its post-mortem records that the redistribution scheduled for 11 November 2022 was postponed for legal and compliance reasons. Whether the distribution was ultimately completed in full is not established by the sources here, and Gala's suit alleges that it was not.
Sources
- pNetworkPrimary · retrieved 2026-08-01
- The BlockSecondary · retrieved 2026-08-01
- HTXPrimary · retrieved 2026-08-01
- Gala Games (via PR Newswire)Primary · retrieved 2026-08-01
Official post-mortem: https://medium.com/pnetwork/pgala-post-mortem-measures-taken-to-safeguard-the-ecosystem-from-malicious-actors-and-recovery-6407048f4497
Cite this
This data is published under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse it, including commercially, as long as you credit iTokenly and link back.
iTokenly Hack Registry, "pNetwork (pGALA bridge) hack — November 2022", iTokenly, accessed 2026-08-01, https://itokenly.com/hacks/pnetwork-pgalahttps://itokenly.com/hacks/pnetwork-pgalaPermalinks never change. If an entry is renamed, the old address keeps working.
Spotted an error? Write to [email protected]. Corrections to published figures are logged on this page. See the methodology for how entries are checked.