T
iTokenly

Alchemix alETH vault hack — June 2021

Verified — 5 sourcesLast checked August 1, 2026

Incident facts

Date of incident
Publicly disclosedJune 16, 2021
Target typeLending protocol
Loss$6,400,000Published estimates range $4,800,000 to $6,500,000Price at time of incident
MethodContract logic errorA deployment-script error accidentally created additional alETH vaults. The protocol then calculated outstanding debts against the wrong vault, so yield was credited incorrectly and protocol funds were applied to user debt, marking loans as repaid. Borrowers whose loans were consequently shown as repaid withdrew their ETH collateral while retaining the alETH they had minted, leaving the vault under-collateralised. Alchemix's own incident report attributes the misapplied yield to the transmuter's harvest function being called with the wrong vault index, sending roughly 4,300 ETH of phantom revenue to the adapter contract; that step is reported only in the forum post and is not corroborated by the news coverage.
ChainsEthereum
OutcomeUsers reimbursed

What happened

On 16 June 2021 users of Alchemix's newly launched alETH vault found their loans showing as fully repaid. They withdrew their ETH collateral while keeping the alETH they had borrowed, leaving the vault under-collateralised.

There was no attacker in the conventional sense and no unauthorised access. A deployment-script error accidentally created extra alETH vaults, and the protocol then calculated debts against the wrong vault, applying protocol funds to user debt so that loans appeared repaid. Anyone who then withdrew took back collateral the protocol had effectively paid off on their behalf. Alchemix paused alETH borrowing while it investigated and published an incident report. Losses were limited by an existing 2,000 alETH borrowing cap. Alchemix's own incident report describes the mechanism more precisely, as the transmuter's harvest function being called with the wrong vault index and sending roughly 4,300 ETH of phantom revenue to the adapter contract; that detail appears only in the forum post.

The size of the shortfall is reported inconsistently. CoinDesk's early account put it near 2,000 ETH, about $4.8 million. The Defiant reported 2,688 ETH, valuing that at roughly $6.4 million on the day, while Cointelegraph used $6.5 million.

Alchemix said no user lost funds and that it would cover the gap through a temporary increase in protocol fees, an ETH injection from its treasury and the sale of treasury DAI, alongside a redeployed vault. It also asked those who had withdrawn to return the excess voluntarily in exchange for future rewards. The proportion actually returned was not disclosed.

Sources

  1. Alchemix (governance forum)Primary · retrieved 2026-08-01
  2. CoinDeskSecondary · retrieved 2026-08-01
  3. The DefiantSecondary · retrieved 2026-08-01
  4. The DefiantSecondary · retrieved 2026-08-01
  5. CointelegraphSecondary · retrieved 2026-08-01

Official post-mortem: https://forum.alchemix.fi/public/d/137-incident-report-06162021

Cite this

This data is published under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse it, including commercially, as long as you credit iTokenly and link back.

iTokenly Hack Registry, "Alchemix alETH vault hack — June 2021", iTokenly, accessed 2026-08-01, https://itokenly.com/hacks/alchemix-aleth-vault
https://itokenly.com/hacks/alchemix-aleth-vault

Permalinks never change. If an entry is renamed, the old address keeps working.

Spotted an error? Write to [email protected]. Corrections to published figures are logged on this page. See the methodology for how entries are checked.